Ford Scorpio 1996 vs Honda Saber 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Scorpio engine produces 33 HP less power than Honda Saber, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Honda Saber. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Saber, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Saber has
| |