Ford Scorpio 1994 vs Toyota Yaris 2009

 
Ford Scorpio
1994 - 1996
Toyota Yaris
2009 - 2011
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 136 HP133 HP
Torque: 175 NM173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds9.1 seconds
Ford Scorpio engine produces 3 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Despite the higher power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.97.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Scorpio consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 285 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Scorpio consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
720 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Yaris) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Scorpio engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years20 years
Engine spread: Used also on Ford MondeoInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect.
Toyota Yaris 2009 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise. One of the most frequent ...  More about Toyota Yaris 2009 1.8 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m3.79 m
Width: 1.88 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.53 m
Ford Scorpio is larger, but lower.
Ford Scorpio is 103 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 19 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 14 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data313 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1183 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`545
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Average price (€): 12003000
Pros and Cons: Ford Scorpio has
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Toyota Yaris has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv