Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Opel Omega 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 116 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 175 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 8.6 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 12.6 | 7.4 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger, but lower. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`743 | ~ 2`101 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |