Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Mazda 626 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Scorpio
1997 - 1998
Mazda 626
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.91.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 207 HP76 - 117 HP
Torque: 167 - 281 NM158 - 173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 13 seconds10.7 - 14.7 seconds
In general, Ford Scorpio are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 626. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.3 - 12.66.8 - 8.3
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.70 m
Width: 1.88 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.40 m
Ford Scorpio is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Scorpio is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data452 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 626.
Gross weight: ~ 1`743 kg~ 1`663 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): no data600
Pros and Cons: Ford Scorpio has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv