Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Jaguar XJ 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Scorpio is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | 3.2 - 4.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 240 - 370 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 316 - 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 5.6 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 12.6 | 11.9 - 13.1 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.31 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 20 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`743 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |