Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Jaguar S-Type 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 - 4.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Scorpio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 240 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 300 - 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 7.1 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 12.6 | 10.3 - 11.9 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar S-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar S-Type, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`743 | ~ 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |