Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo 166 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 136 - 226 HP | |
Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 187 - 304 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 7.8 - 9.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 12.6 | 7.3 - 13.0 | |
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Ford Scorpio is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Scorpio is 10 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`743 | ~ 1`995 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |