Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Scorpio
1997 - 1998
Alfa Romeo 166
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo 166 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.92.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 207 HP136 - 226 HP
Torque: 167 - 281 NM187 - 304 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 13 seconds7.8 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.3 - 12.67.3 - 13.0
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.72 m
Width: 1.88 m1.82 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Ford Scorpio is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Scorpio is 10 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data500 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`743~ 1`995
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons: Ford Scorpio has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv