Ford Scorpio 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Scorpio is available only with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo 164 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 125 - 228 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 187 - 294 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 12.6 | 6.8 - 11.0 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 164. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 164. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 24 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 164, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.4 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 164, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`743 | ~ 2`032 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has
| |