Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Opel Omega 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 146 HP | 73 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 - 270 NM | 138 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.8 seconds | 8.2 - 20.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.7 | 7.2 - 11.3 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`550 | ~ 2`029 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
| |