Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Audi 80 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Scorpio is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi 80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 146 HP | 75 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 - 270 NM | 130 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.8 seconds | 8.2 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.7 | 5.5 - 10.5 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi 80. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 26 cm longer than the Audi 80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`550 | ~ 1`879 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Audi 80 has
| |