Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Audi 100 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Scorpio is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi 100 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 146 HP | 82 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 - 270 NM | 157 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.8 seconds | 6.6 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.7 | 6.5 - 13.2 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 100. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is smaller, but higher. Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1310 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 1 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`550 | ~ 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Audi 100 has
| |