Ford Scorpio 1994 vs Volvo 960 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 2.9 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Scorpio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 207 HP | 170 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 281 NM | 233 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.3 seconds | 9.3 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 12.8 | 10.6 - 11.1 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 960. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`771 | ~ 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |