Ford Scorpio 1992 vs SAAB 900 1984
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 900 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 2.1 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 - 194 HP | 100 - 175 HP | |
Torque: | 171 - 275 NM | 161 - 273 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 14 seconds | 8.7 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.2 | 9.5 - 11.0 | |
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 900. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Ford Scorpio is 4 cm shorter than the SAAB 900, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.1 metres more than that of the SAAB 900. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`753 | ~ 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
SAAB 900 has
| |