Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Fiat Croma 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive, while Fiat Croma can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 1.9 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 - 194 HP | 92 - 162 HP | |
Torque: | 171 - 275 NM | 162 - 247 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 14 seconds | 8.2 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.2 | 5.1 - 10.0 | |
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Croma. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Ford Scorpio is 15 cm longer than the Fiat Croma, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`753 | ~ 1`320 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Fiat Croma has
| |