Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo 960 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 194 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 - 275 NM | 225 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 14 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.2 | 8.1 - 11.2 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 960. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`748 | ~ 2`027 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |