Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Rover 400 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Scorpio is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Rover 400 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 194 HP | 67 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 - 275 NM | 121 - 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 14 seconds | 8.4 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.2 | 5.6 - 8.9 | |
|
Ford Scorpio petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. On average, Ford Scorpio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 37 cm longer than the Rover 400, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`748 | ~ 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Rover 400 has
| |