Ford Probe 1994 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 164 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 212 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is a more dynamic driving. Ford Probe engine produces 122 HP less power than Mitsubishi 3000 GT, whereas torque is 195 NM less than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. Due to the lower power, Ford Probe reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 12.4 | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Probe consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means that by driving the Ford Probe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.28 m | |
| Ford Probe is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Probe is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Probe is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Probe has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |