Ford Probe 1994 vs Toyota Celica 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 164 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 212 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Ford Probe engine produces 8 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Toyota Celica. Despite the higher power, Ford Probe reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Probe consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Probe could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Probe consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Probe is larger. Ford Probe is 16 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Probe is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Probe is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |