Ford Probe 1994 vs Honda Prelude 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 164 HP | 185 HP | |
Torque: | 212 NM | 206 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Honda Prelude is a more dynamic driving. Ford Probe engine produces 21 HP less power than Honda Prelude, but torque is 6 NM more than Honda Prelude. Due to the lower power, Ford Probe reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Probe consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Probe could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Probe consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
580 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.32 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Probe is 4 cm longer than the Honda Prelude, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Probe is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda Prelude. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Prelude has
| |