Ford Probe 1993 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is a more dynamic driving. Ford Probe engine produces 168 HP less power than Mitsubishi 3000 GT, whereas torque is 237 NM less than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. Due to the lower power, Ford Probe reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 12.4 | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Probe consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means that by driving the Ford Probe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Probe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.28 m | |
| Ford Probe is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Probe is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Probe is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Probe has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |