Ford Probe 1993 vs Honda Prelude 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Prelude is a more dynamic driving. Ford Probe engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Honda Prelude. Due to the lower power, Ford Probe reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Probe consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that by driving the Ford Probe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Probe consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Probe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Probe is 4 cm longer than the Honda Prelude, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Probe is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Probe is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Probe has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |