Ford Probe 1993 vs Honda CRX 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CRX is a more dynamic driving. Ford Probe engine produces 7 HP less power than Honda CRX, but torque is 28 NM more than Honda CRX. Due to the lower power, Ford Probe reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Probe consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Probe could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Probe consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Probe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Ford Probe is larger. Ford Probe is 58 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Probe is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Probe is 2 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Ford Probe can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Probe has
|
Honda CRX has
| |