Ford Probe 1993 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Probe is available with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 164 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 212 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.1 | 11.1 - 12.4 | |
|
Ford Probe petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.28 m | |
| Ford Probe is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Probe is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Probe is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Probe has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |