Ford Probe 1993 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ford Probe is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 164 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 212 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.1 | 10.0 | |
|
Ford Probe petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Probe is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Probe is 34 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Probe is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 923 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Probe has
|
| |