Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Chrysler 200 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 15 HP less power than Chrysler 200, but torque is 15 NM more than Chrysler 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 9.8 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo and Chrysler 200 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 429 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 39 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |