Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Mazda 6 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
1400 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo and Mazda 6 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 429 litres | 489 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda 6 scores higher in safety tests, butFord Mondeo is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |