Ford Mondeo 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo 1999 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo 1999 engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford Mondeo 1996, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford Mondeo 1996. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo 1999 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 1999 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo 1999 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Ford Cougar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo 1996 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo 1999 and Ford Mondeo 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo 1999 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 1996. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |