Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 14 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 452 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo has 28 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626. The Mazda 626 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |