Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP116 HP
Torque: 158 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds11 seconds
Ford Mondeo 1996 and Ford Mondeo 1996 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Mondeo 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.88.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.4 l/100km
By specification Ford Mondeo 1996 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1050 km on highway
730 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.56 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.37 m1.37 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo 1996 and Ford Mondeo 1996 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1290 litres1290 litres
Ford Mondeo 1996 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 1996.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`790
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 600600
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons:
    Ford Mondeo has
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv