Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Rover 45 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 45 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 1 HP less power than Rover 45, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Rover 45. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.7 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Rover 45, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 810 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Rover 45. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Rover 45 has
| |