Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Volvo S40 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 177 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 1130 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 853 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has 1 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 437 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |