Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Volvo S40 2000

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP102 HP
Torque: 177 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.35.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway1420 km on highway
910 km with real consumption1130 km with real consumption
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.48 m
Width: 1.75 m1.72 m
Height: 1.37 m1.41 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mondeo is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1290 litres853 litres
Ford Mondeo has 1 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 437 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8551`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Ford Mondeo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 7.0/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv