Ford Mondeo 2002 vs Jaguar X-Type 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 194 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 244 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Jaguar X-Type is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 24 HP less power than Jaguar X-Type, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Jaguar X-Type. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar X-Type, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar X-Type. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
530 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Jaguar X-Type 2001: Vehicle has full-time all-wheel drive with 60/40 front-to-rear torque split via viscous-coupling, locking planetary differential. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Jaguar S-Type | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar X-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Ford Mondeo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Ford Mondeo 2002 2.5 engine: The LCBD engine features a multi-point fuel injection system, where each cylinder is equipped with its own injector for precise fuel delivery. This system is highly durable and reliable, with a low likelihood of ... More about Ford Mondeo 2002 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 6 cm longer than the Jaguar X-Type, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 452 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 452 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 48 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar X-Type. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jaguar X-Type. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`120 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Jaguar X-Type has
| |