Ford Mondeo 2000 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 245 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo 2000 engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford Mondeo 2003, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Ford Mondeo 2003. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Ford Mondeo 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo 2000 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2003. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
820 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo 2000 and Ford Mondeo 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`975 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |