Ford Mondeo 2000 vs Nissan Primera 2003

 
Ford Mondeo
2000 - 2002
Nissan Primera
2003 - 2004
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 115 HP120 HP
Torque: 280 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds11.1 seconds
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Primera, but torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Primera. Despite less power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Nissan Primera is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primera.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1080 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1290 km on highway
820 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Nissan Primera gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Primera engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 2 years8 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Primera might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Ford Mondeo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Nissan Primera 2003 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ...  More about Nissan Primera 2003 1.9 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.68 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower.
Ford Mondeo is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Primera, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1670 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 35 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Primera.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Primera.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`995
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Primera, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
Nissan Primera has
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv