Ford Mondeo 2002 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 18 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, but torque is 103 NM more than Chrysler Neon. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 130 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |