Ford Mondeo 2002 vs Seat Cordoba 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 133 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 47 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 57 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 17 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |