Ford Mondeo 2000 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998

 
Ford Mondeo
2000 - 2003
Alfa Romeo 166
1998 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 145 HP155 HP
Torque: 190 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds9.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 10 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, but torque is 3 NM more than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.09.7
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Mondeo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway980 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km290'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years3 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 145, Alfa Romeo Spider
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Alfa Romeo 166 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.72 m
Width: 1.81 m1.82 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres490 litres
Ford Mondeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8651`930
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv