Ford Mondeo 2000 vs Citroen C5 2001
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen C5, but torque is 5 NM more than Citroen C5. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C5, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Citroen C5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Citroen C5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C5 has
| |