Ford Mondeo 2000 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 12 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, but torque is 5 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 130 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |