Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Audi A4 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.1 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 226 HP | 256 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
Audi A4 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Audi A4. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
540 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Audi A4 2004: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control that operates at speeds up to 40 km/h and applies brakes to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 360'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Audi A6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Audi A4 2004 3.1 engine: The engine is prone to piston ring sticking and oil consumption, often requiring replacement of the pistons with forged ones. Frequent oil changes can help mitigate this issue, as can occasional high-speed ... More about Audi A4 2004 3.1 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 14 cm longer than the Audi A4, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 720 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`090 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Audi A4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A4, so Audi A4 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Audi A4 has
| |