Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Rover 75 2004

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 245 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds11.7 seconds
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 26 HP less power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Rover 75. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.8
Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1380 km on highway
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.75 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.39 m
Ford Mondeo is 2 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data432 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo has 68 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 75.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9802`030
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 10001400
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv