Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 85 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |