Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 1 HP less power than Rover 75, but torque is 30 NM more than Rover 75. Despite less power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 2 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo has 68 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Rover 75 has
| |