Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Volvo S60 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.5 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1034 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 76 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`975 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`491 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 484 kg | 430 kg | |
| Ford Mondeo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |