Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Volvo S60
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP130 HP
Torque: 280 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.57.6
Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1200 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.58 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 76 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9752`050
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Ford Mondeo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv