Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Chrysler Sebring 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 58 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.4 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 11 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 455 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo has 45 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. The Chrysler Sebring may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |