Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 14 HP more power than Chevrolet Evanda, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.6 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Evanda, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |