Ford Mondeo 2005 vs Ford Focus 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 55 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Focus engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Ford Mondeo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 37 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1247 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 115 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Focus, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford Focus has
| |