Ford Mondeo 2005 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 39 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.8 | |
| Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 2 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo has 68 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Rover 75 has
| |