Ford Mondeo 2007 vs BMW 5 series 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 45 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 50 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 380'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
BMW 5 sērija 2007 2.5 engine: Engine is relatively reliable. Most problems relate to the fuel injection system, spark plugs and coils, and the Vanos phase control system. Problems with the high pressure fuel pump were common in early model ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2007 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
Ford Mondeo and BMW 5 series are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 554 litres | 520 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 34 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`085 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
BMW 5 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW 5 series, so BMW 5 series quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 6800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |